Comments on: A second look at Real Rank as something other then a Google alternative http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative Keeping You In Touch With Technology Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:50:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Evelyn http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-57697 Evelyn Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:34:37 +0000 http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-57697 Thank you for the article. It's nice to know that people in the know are really examining things. I was PR "scolded" and then a few days later, "slapped," hard. I still don't quite understand what Google's real problem is, but I'm still trying to figure out how I feel after the shock. I was warned, but that doesn't make it better. Thank you for the article. It’s nice to know that people in the know are really examining things. I was PR “scolded” and then a few days later, “slapped,” hard. I still don’t quite understand what Google’s real problem is, but I’m still trying to figure out how I feel after the shock. I was warned, but that doesn’t make it better.

]]> By: Matt http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-51327 Matt Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:45:36 +0000 http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-51327 Yeah, it's always funny how people will try to claim PR is useless or old news...perhaps they will change the algo to match up with black hat techniques the same with SERPS. Like you stated about the same anchor linking to 2 sites the one with PR should give it more link juice; I think people know this yet continue to claim it's a waste of time. The guys at Google are pretty good at what they do so I don't see any alternative really 'replacing' their system. Yeah, it’s always funny how people will try to claim PR is useless or old news…perhaps they will change the algo to match up with black hat techniques the same with SERPS. Like you stated about the same anchor linking to 2 sites the one with PR should give it more link juice; I think people know this yet continue to claim it’s a waste of time. The guys at Google are pretty good at what they do so I don’t see any alternative really ‘replacing’ their system.

]]> By: Promotional Dude http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-50687 Promotional Dude Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:14:58 +0000 http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-50687 Hey Jack, I wonder how it is that we have not met yet. Were you at pubcon and SES San Jose this year? If you are going to SMX we should meet up and introduce. My first take of this is that Izea is trying to jack up the value of their paid links ahemm I mean reviews. Well more power to them, I am not buying any of these because I don't want to risk reducing my sites quality score, which is something they don't show us. Hey Jack,
I wonder how it is that we have not met yet. Were you at pubcon and SES San Jose this year? If you are going to SMX we should meet up and introduce. My first take of this is that Izea is trying to jack up the value of their paid links ahemm I mean reviews.
Well more power to them, I am not buying any of these because I don’t want to risk reducing my sites quality score, which is something they don’t show us.

]]> By: Mark Barrera http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-49829 Mark Barrera Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:18:45 +0000 http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-49829 Helen, You are correct about the PR0 that you are seeing in the toolbar being misleading. We will be publishing a post this week at the <a href="http://www.businessindallas.com" title="Dallas Business Blog">Dallas Business Blog</a> this week to answer this question more in detail. Helen,

You are correct about the PR0 that you are seeing in the toolbar being misleading.

We will be publishing a post this week at the Dallas Business Blog this week to answer this question more in detail.

]]> By: helen http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-49786 helen Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:57:09 +0000 http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/a-second-look-at-real-rank-as-something-other-then-a-google-alternative#comment-49786 Hi, good analysis and I do agree PR and RR is completely different. PR will never lose its relevance for the fact there will be advertisers out there who are looking for PR for SEO purposes. RR will come in useful only for advertisers who wish to have word of mouth advertising. Jack, I would like to know what do you think is the definition of PR0? I mean from what I rightly gather, links from PR0 would not have made it into the search result with their keywords, right? I've checked a few sites that's been hit by Big G and their keywords came out in the search results. Quite highly on top I might add... So, in view of that, PR0 does not exactly mean 0 relevance as far as the search result is concerned, right? Hi, good analysis and I do agree PR and RR is completely different. PR will never lose its relevance for the fact there will be advertisers out there who are looking for PR for SEO purposes. RR will come in useful only for advertisers who wish to have word of mouth advertising.

Jack, I would like to know what do you think is the definition of PR0? I mean from what I rightly gather, links from PR0 would not have made it into the search result with their keywords, right? I’ve checked a few sites that’s been hit by Big G and their keywords came out in the search results. Quite highly on top I might add… So, in view of that, PR0 does not exactly mean 0 relevance as far as the search result is concerned, right?

]]>