<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So is there any money in being paid to post?</title>
	<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/so-is-there-any-money-in-being-paid-to-post</link>
	<description>Keeping You In Touch With Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jspirko</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/so-is-there-any-money-in-being-paid-to-post#comment-12619</link>
		<author>jspirko</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/so-is-there-any-money-in-being-paid-to-post#comment-12619</guid>
		<description>I think the effects are two fold for advertisers.

First the general buzz and syndication via feeds.  This is mostly from bigger and very popular blogs that cost a lot more to get posted in.

Second is the SEO link effect.  I see this as wax, wane, wax effect.  Here is what I mean.

You buy posts and they will push your rank hard at first because they are on the main page of the blog you buy from.  So you have a high PR link.  (wax)

Next the post will get pushed off the main page into the arcives.  The permalink page will remain but the link moves to a lower PR page. (wane)

In time the lower page will get a lot of internal link power and get its own PR, (wax again)

Now smart seo's will pop a few links from their networks to some of the posts they bought.  Most won't (too fricken lazy) do it but those that do will unleash the full power that this type of optimization opens the door to.

Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the effects are two fold for advertisers.</p>
<p>First the general buzz and syndication via feeds.  This is mostly from bigger and very popular blogs that cost a lot more to get posted in.</p>
<p>Second is the SEO link effect.  I see this as wax, wane, wax effect.  Here is what I mean.</p>
<p>You buy posts and they will push your rank hard at first because they are on the main page of the blog you buy from.  So you have a high PR link.  (wax)</p>
<p>Next the post will get pushed off the main page into the arcives.  The permalink page will remain but the link moves to a lower PR page. (wane)</p>
<p>In time the lower page will get a lot of internal link power and get its own PR, (wax again)</p>
<p>Now smart seo&#8217;s will pop a few links from their networks to some of the posts they bought.  Most won&#8217;t (too fricken lazy) do it but those that do will unleash the full power that this type of optimization opens the door to.</p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collieman</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/so-is-there-any-money-in-being-paid-to-post#comment-12424</link>
		<author>Collieman</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/so-is-there-any-money-in-being-paid-to-post#comment-12424</guid>
		<description>Jack, 
Yes, we have started to use this and although its early days it does seem to help the advertiser.I do wonder about the longer term benefits of this work and suspect that it might drift a little. Still, we are on board for the moment.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,<br />
Yes, we have started to use this and although its early days it does seem to help the advertiser.I do wonder about the longer term benefits of this work and suspect that it might drift a little. Still, we are on board for the moment.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
