<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Killing the Rel=Nofollow Command</title>
	<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command</link>
	<description>Keeping You In Touch With Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Diigo as a master social bookmarking tool - ComTech News</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-6399</link>
		<author>Diigo as a master social bookmarking tool - ComTech News</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-6399</guid>
		<description>[...] Just like at one time you worked to get you web pages into LookSmart, HotBot, etc. I have also noticed that while links and Del.icio.us are all tagged with rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; and therefore don&#8217;t help with link popularity for SEO that many of the others are not tagged and I have found that Google and the others not only will index you personal Diigo, RawSugar, etc pages if you provide links to them from other web pages, they will also deep crawl the links and follow them. How much link popularity boost will they provide?&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Just like at one time you worked to get you web pages into LookSmart, HotBot, etc. I have also noticed that while links and Del.icio.us are all tagged with rel=&rdquo;nofollow&rdquo; and therefore don&rsquo;t help with link popularity for SEO that many of the others are not tagged and I have found that Google and the others not only will index you personal Diigo, RawSugar, etc pages if you provide links to them from other web pages, they will also deep crawl the links and follow them. How much link popularity boost will they provide?&nbsp; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graywolf Slams Google - ComTech News</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5862</link>
		<author>Graywolf Slams Google - ComTech News</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>[...] Graywolf Slams Google Posted in Search Marketing, Blogging by jspirko on January 25th, 2007   Spured on by the same reviews and discussions about Wikipedia&#39;s decision to add rel=&#34;nofollow&#34; that led us at Comtech News to kill all use of rel=&#34;nofollow&#34; on our popular blog and give our readers full credit for comment links, Michale Gray (known as Graywolf) has done what I must say is one of the best slams on Google I have ever seen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Graywolf Slams Google Posted in Search Marketing, Blogging by jspirko on January 25th, 2007   Spured on by the same reviews and discussions about Wikipedia&#39;s decision to add rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; that led us at Comtech News to kill all use of rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on our popular blog and give our readers full credit for comment links, Michale Gray (known as Graywolf) has done what I must say is one of the best slams on Google I have ever seen. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jspirko</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5814</link>
		<author>jspirko</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5814</guid>
		<description>Seo Practices said, "I have seen it myself, SE do not follow “nofollow”."

This is a topic of much debate.  There are clear tests that show indeed search engines respecting the nofollow command.  There have also been plenty showing them to not follow the command.

Many times the truth is somewhere in between.  Do I believe a bunch of nofollow links are just as good as links with out the command? NO WAY.  

Do I believe the the engines 100% respect the command at all times and there is zero effect on the rankings based upon them?  NO!

I don't buy that either, I have done too many experiments that have gotten sub pages indexed against the nofollow command.  I have done others where it was respected.  Like I said the truth is somewhere in the gray area,

Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seo Practices said, &#8220;I have seen it myself, SE do not follow “nofollow”.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a topic of much debate.  There are clear tests that show indeed search engines respecting the nofollow command.  There have also been plenty showing them to not follow the command.</p>
<p>Many times the truth is somewhere in between.  Do I believe a bunch of nofollow links are just as good as links with out the command? NO WAY.  </p>
<p>Do I believe the the engines 100% respect the command at all times and there is zero effect on the rankings based upon them?  NO!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy that either, I have done too many experiments that have gotten sub pages indexed against the nofollow command.  I have done others where it was respected.  Like I said the truth is somewhere in the gray area,</p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5812</link>
		<author>Seo Practices</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5812</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, the rel="nofollow" isn't going to stop spam, I have seen it myself, SE do not follow "nofollow".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; isn&#8217;t going to stop spam, I have seen it myself, SE do not follow &#8220;nofollow&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jspirko</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5794</link>
		<author>jspirko</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>I appreciate you Andy and added your blog to my reader as well!  If you want to be on my Friends of Do Follow page, just let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate you Andy and added your blog to my reader as well!  If you want to be on my Friends of Do Follow page, just let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5793</link>
		<author>Andy Beard</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.comtechnews.net/search-marketing/we-are-killing-the-relnofollow-command#comment-5793</guid>
		<description>Good move, you gained another subscriber. I follow exactly the same methodology on all my own blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good move, you gained another subscriber. I follow exactly the same methodology on all my own blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
